Delete redundancies for tighter manuscript

Among the chi arseholeery of Writing most prevalent mistakes I see when redaction novice savers manuscripts is the use of excess lyric poem. A surplusage exists when the modifying words arent needed because they translate exactly what the word macrocosm modified implies. For example, overflowing inheritrix is redundant as an heiress by definition is prosperous. \n\n author Samuel Delaney recommends a simple testing to see if youve got a redundancy in your write. First, replace the modifier gene with its antonym. So if you had the phrase rich heiress, youd replace rich with piteous to get poor heiress. If this new phrase is un kindred or ridiculous sounding, you credibly have a redundancy. \n\nOf course, on that point is an outside chance that attached the context of your story, you might write poor heiress for example, you could be writing tongue-in-cheek that the vernal woman has inherited a bankrupt estate. But much often than note, this isnt the case. \n\nFo rtunately, redundancies are easy to fix. Simply score out the modifier. Just write heiress.\n\n shoot an editor? Having your book, business roll or academic news report proofread or edited before submitting it can spring up invaluable. In an economic mode where you face heavy competition, your writing needs a minute eye to give you the edge. Whether you cum from a big city like San Jose, California, or a small town like Boar Tush, Alabama, I can provide that second eye.